<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.deertier.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALeaderboard_Layout_Suggestions</id>
	<title>Talk:Leaderboard Layout Suggestions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.deertier.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALeaderboard_Layout_Suggestions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.deertier.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leaderboard_Layout_Suggestions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-26T03:16:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.deertier.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leaderboard_Layout_Suggestions&amp;diff=759&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Foosda at 19:57, 21 November 2016</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.deertier.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leaderboard_Layout_Suggestions&amp;diff=759&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-11-21T19:57:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;If 100% Map Completion would drop the &amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; tag (which I agree with following the reasoning on the page), it needs to be out outside of 100% tab. Under Major Glitches, I suggest adding a 14% tab, which would include (partially) MG 14% categories: Chargeless variants (Underflow) and X-Ice. Regarding X-Ice, X-Climb seems to be a bit controversial and G-Mode (which at least Matrick&amp;#039;s run uses) certainly is. So I think this category is better fit under 14% MG.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I&amp;#039;d like to see a rules tab just like SRC has, and perhaps e.g. a direct link to deanyd regarding category/route info.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-RBO should either be spelled out or renamed. Because while it&amp;#039;s doing it&amp;#039;s best to beat all the (major) bosses in the game in a reverse order without using any major glitches, it&amp;#039;s technically still not the Reverse Boss Order. A suggestion would be to drop it under any% and call it any% RDPK. The reasoning behind this is just like Map Completion technically not being 100%, RBO does not have a specific item goal (percentage). Definitely &amp;#039;&amp;#039;not&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a popular opinion, but I figured it makes more sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I&amp;#039;m not against moving GT Classic to NMG as long as it is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;it&amp;#039;s own category&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, but that would probably cause more confusion than it&amp;#039;d be worth. But I&amp;#039;ll forward the argument anyway: Because GT code is technically a cheat code and not a &amp;quot;glitch&amp;quot;, and because GT Classic is vastly different from any% GT Code, it could be worth looking into moving it. However, to keep things as clean as possible, it could be worth considering having both as an any% tab.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-As for the RTA categories and Ceres escape, these could be moved under Partial, or RTA (except for Ceres which is IGT). -Enmet&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#039;d be pretty stoked to rename RBO/Reverse Boss Order to something more along the lines of what it actually is, i.e. Reverse Golden 4/RG4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-foosda&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Foosda</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>